• Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
Note: We do not provide legal or tax advice; this is provided by professional lawyers.
BE CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
  • Lyoness – Lyconet – myWorld
  • Karatbars – GSPartners&Co
  • Other Companies
    • Safir – ZENIQ – XERA.PRO – XPRO
    • Avinoc – VOO
  • Services
    • Pyramid and Ponzi Schemes
    • Cryptocurrencies
    • Divorce Cases (private & business)
    • Inheritance Cases
    • Corporate matters (Takeovers)
    • Bad Debts
    • Asset Inquiry
    • Real Estate
  • Testimonials
  • International TV
  • About us
  • Contact
  • English
    • Deutsch
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Complaint due to careless investigation by the Prosecutor´s Office

18. August 2016

We don´t want to accept the closing of the criminal investigations by the Austrian Prosecutor´s Office Against Economic Crime and Corruption (WKStA) into suspicions of systematic fraud and pyramid scheme on April 2016 and have therefore involved the Senior Public Prosecutor’s Office (OSTA) and presented a comprehensive disciplinary complaint.

 The public prosecutor brought the draft of a criminal case to the Senior Public Prosecutor’s Office after a four years’ investigation in 2015 that had then to be deferred due to “serious formal and substantive shortcomings”. The public prosecutor didn´t comply with the following formal criteria: The Senior Prosecutor´s Office reprimand refers to the fact that after the content list, the heading “Justification” should have been inserted. It also criticises that the prosecutor should have limited himself to the “facts relevant to the charges under consideration” and supported his justification “in an illustrative, intelligible form”. “Reference is made to the remaining uncorrected grammar and typing mistakes, as well as to the coloured highlighting in the public prosecutor’s deferred draft”, reads a communication from OSTA to WKStA.

Despite the request for improvement that was received on July 9, 2015, the public prosecutor failed to act, as we and the Viennese lawyer Dr. Fromhold criticize. All this didn´t happen although the WKStA could have made the necessary corrections very easily.

After two months, no improved case was sent back. The Vienna Regional Criminal Court stopped therefore the criminal investigation against Friedl and Lyoness Europe AG for systematic fraud and pyramid scheme by a decision of November 18, 2015.

The Senior Prosecutor´s Office Vienna is currently investigating the disciplinary complaint. “The disciplinary complaint has been received and is currently being examined”, said the First Senior Prosecutor Michael Klackl to the Austrian Press Agency (APA).

Lawyer Josef Fromhold makes serious accusations against the responsible prosecutor too. He states that the prosecutor´s performance was amateurish. He also told APA: “I asked him why he hadn´t heard the damaged parties. He just laughed and said: ‘I´ve got evidence enough’”. The prosecutor only heard witnesses for the defence, Fromhold declared. He is sure, that the inadequacies of the criminal investigation are a recurring theme through the entire criminal file. He also points out, by way of example, that the investigators hadn´t managed to seize 89,000 EUR from one of Friedl´s accounts, adding that the corresponding decision had been repealed by the Higher Regional Court (OLG) Vienna due to defects in the statement of reasons required and that after some twists and turns the investigator had refrained from presenting a new application for seizure. In its decision, the Vienna Regional Criminal Court pointed out some shortcomings too. The court wrote that the Prosecutor´s Office against Economic Crime and Corruption (WKStA) didn´t “investigate fully the incrimination of systematic fraud”. It also stated that due to the fact that the suspects hadn´t pretended that there were chances of winning, “there is no condition for criminality due to fraud”.

We criticise also the fact that the prosecutor didn´t carry out or managed to justify without formal errors any seizures or an “urgently needed examination of the IT-system”, as the court defined it.

As it is stated in the complementary letter of the disciplinary complaint dated August 1, 2016: “Naturally, when investigations are carried out in such a way, no relevant results can be obtained to appraise the facts of the proceedings, but the suspect can continue expanding his system undisturbed. They helped the system to generate even more (non-recoverable) income.

It was always clear to us: Lyoness members were deceived. They were promised profits and a career if they kept buying at Lyoness partner companies… we will not stop until all damaged members have recovered the invested money.

See also the press articles:

Tiroler Tageszeitung

Wirtschaftsblatt

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/logo-konfliktmanagement.jpg 0 0 Dolphin Media Production /wp-content/uploads/2015/11/logo-konfliktmanagement.jpg Dolphin Media Production2016-08-18 12:06:532016-09-02 10:44:34Complaint due to careless investigation by the Prosecutor´s Office
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Categories

  • Avinoc – VOO
  • Common
  • IM Mastery Academy
  • IM Mastery Academy (Iyovia)
  • Karatbars – GSPartners & Co
  • KASTECH Group International
  • Lyoness – Lyconet – MyWorld
  • MINING GRID
  • other companies
  • Premium Safe
  • Safir – ZENIQ – XERA.PRO – XPRO
  • SKAINET CermakFX
  • Solar9580 e.K.
  • SWM AG
  • WISE

Search

Search Search

Recent Posts

  • Cashback , Bitcoin and MiCA – WEXO’s European relaunch does not resolve the open questions.
  • Banks: Neutral in MLM structures, merciless towards victims – a system of turning a blind eye and arbitrariness
  • From dream salesman to business architect? – The past cannot be renamed.
  • Insolvency Update June 2026
  • Dada Pey’s Next Venture: From Universe Trading through Shiiro to Sonic AI & TAG Markets

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • June 2018
  • January 2018
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016

BE CONFLICT
MANAGEMENT
LIMITED


 

Note: We do not provide legal or tax advice; this is provided by professional lawyers.

Facebook Twitter Instagram

OUR SERVICES

  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Divorce Cases (private & business)
  • Inheritance Cases
  • Corporate matters (Takeovers)
  • Bad Debts
  • Asset Inquiry
  • Real Estate

OUR CASES

  • Lyoness, Lyconet, myWorld
  • Karatbars/AcuaWellington/GSPartners & Minebase.com
  • SWM AG
  • Premium Safe
  • Avinoc – VOO
  • Safir – ZENIQ – XERA.PRO – XPRO

CONTACT

BE CONFLICT MANAGEMENT 77 Camden Street Lower, Dublin,
Dublin 2, D02 XE80, Ireland
Company registration number: 692857

[email protected]

Austria Phone +43 1 2051 0854 28
Austria Fax. +43 (1) 25330333458
Ireland Phone +353 1 270 9700
Australia Phone +61 2 6145 2753

© Copyright - BE Conflict Management LTD.
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Imprint
  • Disclaimer
Link to: Chain stores keep their distance from Lyoness Link to: Chain stores keep their distance from Lyoness Chain stores keep their distance from Lyoness Link to: Lyoness sues and opts for a step forward in India! Link to: Lyoness sues and opts for a step forward in India! Lyoness sues and opts for a step forward in India!
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top