VOO Copper & Co: How Much Longer Will This Farce Continue?

Once Again: Announcements Without Substance

Another act in the ongoing tragedy of VOO Copper & Co: the latest “grand presentation” was abruptly postponed from May 8 to May 15. For those familiar with the history of this dubious network, it’s hardly surprising. For years, this project has been a series of announcements that ultimately fizzle out. What remains is an increasingly frustrated community, strung along by empty promises—and often left with empty bank accounts.

AVINOC, ZENIQ, SAFIR—and Now VOO Copper & Co: Same Scheme, New Names

What began under the name Zeniq and evolved through Safir, Avinoc, Layerk, Xera, and now VOO, has remained fundamentally unchanged: a meticulously orchestrated construct filled with tech buzzwords, alleged blockchain innovation, supposedly unique products—and a distribution model that closely resembles classic network marketing, if not a pyramid scheme.

While former figures like Erwin Doktor and Werner Kaiser are reportedly more or less involved, the victims are left behind—hoping that the next promise will finally be fulfilled. Yet, as is often the case, hope is no substitute for facts.

The Current State: Chaos, Technical Issues, Loss of Trust

Users have been waiting weeks or even months for promised “shares,” whose legal standing remains unclear. The AVINOC exchange is stalled—allegedly due to technical problems. The ERC20–ZEN20 bridge is faulty; IP addresses need to be “fixed.” Classic smokescreen terminology.

A sophisticated ecosystem is presented to the public, but in reality, many struggle to log in or link their accounts. Internal chats suggest that “20 to 30 individuals” are handling community support for thousands. It’s no wonder that the number of overwhelmed and abandoned users is likely growing daily.

VOO Copper & Co’s Tactic: Always “Coming Soon”

The strategy is familiar: when trust wanes, shift focus to the “next big thing.” Currently, it’s VOO Travel, .One, or the much-hyped “shares”—none of which function properly. Meanwhile, the value of previous projects paints a grim picture: AVINOC and Zeniq are in free fall, mostly listed on dubious exchanges or no longer tradable. Nevertheless, new coins are still being minted—and, of course, paid for.

The pattern is clear: rebrand, distract, resell. What many fail to understand—or realize too late—is that these name changes are not traditional rebranding efforts but deliberate attempts to evade consequences. Those who believe it’s the same project are intentionally kept in the dark. Communication has always been lacking in these circles—and that’s by design.

Conclusion: The Damage Is Real—and Far from Over

Despite desires for community, support, and vision, what’s unfolding here has nothing to do with genuine blockchain or technology projects. Rather, current statements from the community reveal deep-seated mistrust—and many are still trying to “save” the system, even though they’ve already become victims themselves.

Transparency, accountability, traceability? Nowhere to be found.

VOO and its entire lineage—from Zeniq to Safir, Avinoc, and beyond—is not a visionary future project but a well-disguised pyramid scheme, repeatedly repackaged to deceive new “investors.” It’s time more people recognize this.

Note: As always, those affected are welcome to share their perspective, and anyone with additional or differing information is encouraged to contact us. We have no interest in making false claims—our primary goal remains to provide comprehensive documentation.

This article is intended solely for informational purposes, journalistic analysis and independent opinion-forming within the meaning of Article 5 of the German Basic Law and Section 51 of the German Copyright Act (UrhG) (right to quote). All information is based on publicly available sources, official communications and careful editorial research. Despite taking the utmost care, we cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the information contained herein.

The mention of companies, persons or projects is based on verifiable research and clearly marked as such. The publication is protected by the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of the press. Contributing sources are subject to editorial source protection in accordance with journalistic standards.

Source: www.bekm.us, Telegram Chat Group .One