Vision One & Voo Travel: Press enquiry regarding structure, regulation and connections to Zeniq/Safir

As part of journalistic research into the latest developments surrounding the Vision One cooperative and previous projects such as Voo Travel, Voo Token and Copper One, our editorial team would appreciate your answering the following questions in this open press enquiry.

Public press enquiry:

Dear Mr Winter, Dear Sir or Madam,

The reason for this request is, among other things, recent statements and announcements from your networkthat clearly contradict external reports, in particular regarding the insolvency of VOO Aviation Service GmbH and VOO Flights GmbH, which were described to the outside world as mere ‘reorganisation measures’.

According to our observations, the Vision One cooperative emerged from the environment of earlier crypto projects such as Zeniq, Avinoc and Safir. Today, it presents itself as a platform for alternative investment models, including tokenisation of physical commodities, cooperative-based bond models (BondEXone) and a crypto-based travel service under the name Voo Travel.

At the same time, numerous aspects raise fundamental questions: from the economic stability of individual companies to the regulatory admissibility of the products offered to the technical functionality and communication strategy of the cooperative. We also view the decision to communicate key content such as product presentations or investment opportunities exclusively behind closed doors and without recording as particularly critical.

Against this background, we request a written statement on the following 23 questionsin order to enable balanced and transparent journalistic reporting. Your response, in full or in excerpts, will be published with reference to the source.

Our questions are as follows:

I. Economic situation & insolvency

1. Is Voo Travel or one of its companies, such as VOO Aviation Service GmbH or VOO Flights GmbH, currently insolvent or unable to pay its debts?
2. What specific steps does the alleged ‘reorganisation’ involve, limited to operational restructuring or also financial restructuring?

II. Voo Travel app & customer situation

1. Since when has the Voo Travel app been unavailable and how many bookings, refunds or customer losses have this resulted in?
2. When do you expect the app to be back on the market?

III. BONDEXONE & regulation

1. How do you ensure that Bondexone issues without a prospectus, notary or lawyer are legally compliant with EU regulations (MiFID II, WAG 2018)?
2. Has a legal review or approval been obtained from the FMA Austria or another supervisory authority?
3. What measures are in place to protect investors against fraud or defaults on the marketplace?

IV. Copper investment (Copper One)

1. Where is the physical copper advertised in the Copper project stored and by whom?
2. Are there independent audit reports or inventory records?
3. How is market coupling ensured given the volatility of the commodity market?

V. Relationship to previous projects (Zeniq, Avinoc)

1. Why are you offering ‘legacy incentives’ for former Zeniq partners when you are simultaneously announcing a separation from Zeniq/Avinoc?
2. Will old wallets, accounts or personal data be transferred?
3. Will reactivation take place with the consent of the original project operators?

VI. Technology & user complaints

1. Why are many users reporting persistent outages with Copper Mintern and invisible tokens?
2. Has your blockchain infrastructure been externally reviewed or audited?
3. How do you technically ensure the separation of user, project and commission funds (e.g. in Nomo Pay)?

VII. Transparency & communication

1. Why are community calls not recorded if the projects are supposedly legally compliant and open?
2. What specific regulatory obstacles justify the exclusion of external reporting?
3. How do you define ‘internal communication’ in relation to public capital raising?

VIII. Cooperative structure & finances

1. How many of your more than 5,000 members are active as investors, and how many are active as promoters?
2. How are the cooperative’s revenues distributed between membership fees, referrals or incentives and project proceeds?
3. Are there audited annual financial statements – and if not, when is an audit planned?

We kindly request a prompt written response to enable us to provide a fair and well-founded account in our planned publication. Your answers, in full or in part, will be quoted with reference to the medium.

Thank you very much for your support. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Kind regards,

Your BEK team

Why these questions are important

The combined function of the cooperative as a sales structure, marketplace operator and technical provider cannot be assessed as unproblematic across the board. This is particularly true when investments are made without prospectuses, tokens without clear value coverage and promises without verifiable results. In such cases, the line between internal cooperative activity and publicly advertised financial products is not only relevant from a regulatory perspective, but also from a moral standpoint.

We will report on further developments. We welcome any information and experiences from cooperative members or former participants, which will be treated confidentially.

Note: This request is made in the context of journalistic research in accordance with Article 10 of the ECHR and Article 5 of the German Basic Law (freedom of the press). The information contained herein is used exclusively for the purpose of clarifying the facts in order to form an independent opinion in the public interest. We kindly request a prompt response for editorial reporting.