• Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
Note: We do not provide legal or tax advice; this is provided by professional lawyers.
BE CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
  • Lyoness – Lyconet – myWorld
  • Karatbars – GSPartners&Co
  • Other Companies
    • Safir – ZENIQ – XERA.PRO – XPRO
    • Avinoc – VOO
  • Services
    • Pyramid and Ponzi Schemes
    • Cryptocurrencies
    • Divorce Cases (private & business)
    • Inheritance Cases
    • Corporate matters (Takeovers)
    • Bad Debts
    • Asset Inquiry
    • Real Estate
  • Testimonials
  • International TV
  • About us
  • Contact
  • English
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

EXFUSION, NEO.FX, TAGMarkets: A Traveling Circus?

2. March 2026

In our previous report, we critically examined the system behind TAGMarkets – particularly in light of the official warning issued by the Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA). The authority explicitly advises against conducting business with TAGMarkets or its associated companies, as they lack the necessary licenses for financial or securities services in Austria. Despite an offshore license in Mauritius, the entity lacks a regulatory foundation within the European Union.

In the following report, we take an expanded look at the network surrounding TAGMarkets—from the BEYOND Conference in Dubai to the interplay between NEO.FX, EXFusion, and the key actors involved.

TAGMarkets, EXFusion & the BEYOND Conference in Dubai: Familiar Patterns

The BEYOND Conference in Dubai was staged as a milestone event. Under the motto “One System – 3 Incomes,” an integrated model consisting of trading, exchange, and payment functions was presented. The visual language was clear: growth, internationality, and exclusivity.

In such contexts, Dubai frequently serves as a projection screen for global reach and success. However, a stage is no substitute for regulation, and an event cannot replace institutional oversight. Notably, the presentations focused less on regulatory transparency or risk management and emphasized scaling, community expansion, and income structures instead.


The Interplay: TAGMarkets, NEO.FX & EXFusion

At its core, the model consists of a structure based on a division of labor:

TAGMarkets acts as the offshore broker based in Mauritius – we have already reported on its offshore license serving as a “fig leaf.”

NEO.FX is marketed as an automated trading or copy-trading solution.

EXFusion forms the community and distribution structure.

Operative account management is handled via TAGMarkets. NEO.FX serves as the marketed trading strategy within this infrastructure. Meanwhile, EXFusion organizes bootcamps, training, affiliate structures, and community expansion—following familiar patterns previously seen in schemes like Lyoness/Lyconet/MyWorld or Safir/ZENIQ, XERA, XPRO, and CONNECT.

For outsiders, this separation is rarely transparent. Economically, deposits and trading activities converge within the broker structure, while marketing, training, and recruitment take place outside of actual financial intermediation. The result is a closed ecosystem with multiple entry points—technically linked and sales-integrated, yet regulatorily fragmented.

The “Traveling Circus” of Fintech Scams: Old Faces, New Logos

The continuity of personnel is particularly remarkable. Names such as Michael Baur, Werner Kaiser, Asker Sakinmaz, Benjamin (Benni) Heimberger, Peter Santer, or Ronald Weissensteiner surface in various, partially heavily criticized projects over the past years. The products change; the narratives remain: Community building. Early entry phase. Exponential scaling. Multiple income streams.

Legally, past involvement in controversial models is not proof of current misconduct. However, from an analytical perspective, a pattern emerges: as projects disappear or lose momentum, the sales actors switch platforms. In the grey market economy, it is often not the brands, but the individuals who represent the actual constant. This rotation of personnel paired with consistent rhetoric serves as a significant red flag for investors.

OneCoin, DAO1, and now EXFusion: Benjamin (Benni) Heimberger

According to information available to us, Benni Heimberger appeared in the orbit of OneCoin in 2016 and was announced as a speaker at various sales events. OneCoin was later internationally classified as a fraudulent crypto system, leading to criminal proceedings against central figures. In subsequent years, Heimberger also appeared in the context of DAO1, another crypto-based community investment model. Both stages are part of his publicly traceable sales track record in high-risk crypto and financial projects. He now serves as a speaker for EXFusion.

SKAINET Systems: Michael Baur

Michael Baur previously appeared as a presenter and sales actor for Skainet Systems. Promoted as a technology- and blockchain-oriented project with a network structure, Skainet Systems lacked any discernible regulation as a financial service provider—we previously reported on Skainet as a point of focus. His involvement follows a series of engagements in marketing-driven, digital financial business models heavily reliant on community and distribution building.

WeWeGlobal, Xera, XPRO & CONNECT: Peter Santer & Ronald Weissensteiner

Two additional names frequently resurface in our research into crypto and financial scams: Peter Santer and Ronald Weissensteiner. They have appeared multiple times as speakers or network partners in various marketing and financial projects. Publicly documented appearances range from WeWe Global to XERA, XPRO, and Connect, extending to recent presentations for EXFusion/TAGMarkets. The recurring presence of the same actors across different, partially controversial business models is an investigative pattern that must be considered when evaluating such offers.

The EXFusion Roadmap: Growth as the Top Priority

The 2026 roadmap recently presented in a video call speaks a clear language: targets of 30,000 to 100,000 community members within a year, alongside turnover targets in the triple-digit millions.

What stands out is not the ambitious growth itself, but what remains uncommunicated: there are no clear regulatory milestones in EU jurisdictions, no transparency regarding capital reserves or risk management, and no detailed compliance strategies. Instead, terms like “Leadership Summits,” “Bootcamps,” “Academy,” and “Community Chapters” dominate. The vocabulary is more reminiscent of a scaling affiliate system than a regulated financial institution. Growth is the priority; institutional anchoring is not.

The Alliance of Bit1 and EndoTech: Technology or Trick?

During the presentations, a close alignment between Bit1 (also known as BITONE) and EndoTech was communicated. In some instances, there was even talk of a “merger.” However, no classic corporate merger is publicly traceable. Rather, all signs point to a technological partnership: Bit1 provides the exchange infrastructure, while EndoTech delivers AI-based trading algorithms.

EndoTech is an Israeli fintech company that develops algorithmic trading strategies operating via API connections. It does not act as a broker or custodian of client funds, but as a technology provider.

Conclusion: Complexity is No Substitute for Regulation

What emerges from the conference, roadmap, personnel structure, and tech partnerships is not a classic broker, not a pure exchange, and not an isolated trading tool. It seems to be an integrated sales ecosystem with a financial link.

The priorities are clearly identifiable: community scaling, distributed income streams, international events, and aggressive growth. What is missing are details on European regulation, transparency of ownership structures, traceable capital protection, and a clear liability architecture.

The more complex a system becomes, the more important clear responsibilities and oversight become. This is precisely the critical weakness here. For investors, this requires a sober assessment: anyone entering such a construct is not just investing in a product—they are investing in a network whose stability depends heavily on growth, marketing dynamics, and personnel continuity. In a regulated financial market, trust is institutionally secured. In a marketing-driven ecosystem, it has yet to be earned.

Note:

This article is a journalistic analysis. It is based on publicly available sources. It is not a legal assessment or financial advice. All assessments have been researched to the best of our knowledge and are marked as opinions within the meaning of Art. 10 ECHR / Art. 5 GG. Counterstatements will be taken into account in accordance with § 56 RStV.

Sources:

  • Screenshots und Chatlog-Material (Telegram/WhatsApp, 2024–2026) archiviert.
  • Vollständige Aufzeichnung des Exfusion-Calls vom 23.02.2026
  • Own Verification (Editorial Team)
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.bekm.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Tagmarkets-Zirkus-Grafik-en.png 1024 1536 Dolphin Media Production /wp-content/uploads/2015/11/logo-konfliktmanagement.jpg Dolphin Media Production2026-03-02 17:04:032026-03-03 08:54:25EXFUSION, NEO.FX, TAGMarkets: A Traveling Circus?
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Categories

  • Avinoc – VOO
  • Common
  • IM Mastery Academy
  • IM Mastery Academy (Iyovia)
  • Karatbars – GSPartners & Co
  • KASTECH Group International
  • Lyoness – Lyconet – MyWorld
  • MINING GRID
  • other companies
  • Premium Safe
  • Safir – ZENIQ – XERA.PRO – XPRO
  • SKAINET CermakFX
  • Solar9580 e.K.
  • SWM AG
  • WISE

Search

Search Search

Recent Posts

  • The MLM Recycle: Former Lyconet Giants Now Recruiting for TAGMarkets
  • NEXT STEP: From lobby group to European institution – BECM expands its structure to include a cooperative for legal interests (SCE)
  • The Next MLM Myth? TAG Markets as a Lifeline for eCredits Victims
  • Anyone who immediately calls every assignment procedure a “scam” simply hasn’t understood the system.
  • “$1 million customer protection?” – Lloyd’s broker distances himself from TagMarkets advertising

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • June 2018
  • January 2018
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016

BE CONFLICT
MANAGEMENT
LIMITED


 

Note: We do not provide legal or tax advice; this is provided by professional lawyers.

Facebook Twitter Instagram

OUR SERVICES

  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Divorce Cases (private & business)
  • Inheritance Cases
  • Corporate matters (Takeovers)
  • Bad Debts
  • Asset Inquiry
  • Real Estate

OUR CASES

  • Lyoness, Lyconet, myWorld
  • Karatbars/AcuaWellington/GSPartners & Minebase.com
  • SWM AG
  • Premium Safe
  • Avinoc – VOO
  • Safir – ZENIQ – XERA.PRO – XPRO

CONTACT

BE CONFLICT MANAGEMENT 77 Camden Street Lower, Dublin,
Dublin 2, D02 XE80, Ireland
Company registration number: 692857

[email protected]

Austria Phone +43 1 2051 0854 28
Austria Fax. +43 (1) 25330333458
Ireland Phone +353 1 270 9700
Australia Phone +61 2 6145 2753

© Copyright - BE Conflict Management LTD.
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Imprint
  • Disclaimer
Link to: 122 complaints, millions in damages – Slovenia is now also investigating Lyconet / myWorld Link to: 122 complaints, millions in damages – Slovenia is now also investigating Lyconet / myWorld 122 complaints, millions in damages – Slovenia is now also investigating Lyconet... Link to: ONZA+: CONNECT’s AI Promise  Link to: ONZA+: CONNECT’s AI Promise  ONZA+: CONNECT’s AI Promise 
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top