The Silence of the Tokens: Growing Frustration in the Safir/ZENIQ Community
As former Safir/ZENIQ and XPRO investors are increasingly being steered toward yet another venture — TAG Markets — frustration continues to mount within the Telegram communities that once promoted these projects.
Recent discussions paint a starkly different picture from the optimistic marketing narratives of the past. For months — and in some cases years — investors have been reporting missing tokens, the absence of reliable support contacts, and the growing feeling that they have been left to deal with their concerns on their own.
Safir/ZENIQ: From Success Stories to Calls for Help
Telegram groups dedicated to Safir/ZENIQ, XPRO, AVINOC, VOO, and the NOMO App are increasingly filled with posts from users seeking assistance with missing tokens, unanswered support requests, and unresolved technical issues.
What was once promoted as a comprehensive blockchain ecosystem with ambitious long-term visions has, for many investors, become a source of growing uncertainty.
Users repeatedly report that certain tokens no longer appear in their wallets or that they simply do not know whom to contact for assistance. While other community members often try to offer technical advice, the conversations have long since moved beyond wallet settings or software updates.
From Technical Issues to Fundamental Questions
For many investors, the core issue is no longer whether individual tokens can be made visible again. The far more pressing question is what economic value the assets displayed within the NOMO App actually have today.
Several community members describe how they followed their investments from one project to the next — from Safir to SGI, then ZENIQ, and ultimately into the NOMO App ecosystem. At every stage, they say they were encouraged to believe that these tokens would eventually gain value or become part of a functioning ecosystem with real-world utility.
Today, many investors still see balances displayed in the application, yet increasingly question whether those holdings have any practical value at all.
What Happened to VOO, AVINOC and the Other Projects?
Another issue repeatedly raised by investors concerns the numerous token projects listed within the NOMO ecosystem. The app still references projects such as VOO, AVINOC, and several other well-known names associated with the former Safir/ZENIQ environment.
From the perspective of many investors, however, there has been little visible progress for these projects in recent times. While some maintain official websites or social media channels, regular public updates demonstrating measurable development, active communities, or tangible real-world adoption appear increasingly scarce.
This naturally raises an important question: What tangible economic value do these tokens actually represent today? Many investors say they have yet to receive a satisfactory answer.

Are Critical Questions No Longer Welcome?
Participants in the discussion also expressed concerns that critical voices may no longer be welcome in certain community groups or that uncomfortable discussions tend to disappear. Based on the information available to us, we cannot independently verify whether this occurs systematically.
Nevertheless, perception matters. Even the impression of limited transparency can significantly erode confidence within an investment community. Projects that have spent years promoting ambitious long-term visions inevitably create expectations of openness and accountability — particularly when investors seek answers about the status of their investments.
While Questions About Safir/ZENIQ Remain Unanswered, TAG Markets Is Already Being Promoted
Perhaps the most striking aspect is the timing. While former investors continue discussing missing tokens, absent support channels, and the uncertain value of their holdings, numerous former top promoters from the Lyoness, Lyconet, Safir, and ZENIQ networks are now actively promoting TAG Markets, CopyX, Sonic AI, and so-called Amplified Accounts.
The projects have changed. Many of the sales structures — and many of the individuals promoting them — have not. Once again, the marketing focuses on technological innovation, exceptional opportunities, and the promise of extraordinary returns. Meanwhile, many of the unresolved questions surrounding previous projects remain unanswered.

A Pattern Investors Should Recognize
Anyone who has followed this industry over the past several years will recognize a familiar pattern. First came Lyoness, followed by Lyconet and myWorld. Then came Safir, ZENIQ, XPRO, AVINOC, VOO, NOMO, and several others.
Today, the spotlight has shifted to TAG Markets, Sonic AI, and Copy Trading. Each new venture is presented as the next major opportunity. At the same time, many investors are still waiting for the promises made by previous projects to materialize.
Conclusion
The ongoing discussions within the NOMO community are noteworthy not simply because of individual technical issues, but because of the broader sentiment they reveal. For many investors, optimism has given way to disappointment. Instead of success stories, community discussions are increasingly dominated by questions about missing tokens, stalled development, and the absence of meaningful support.
And while many investors are still searching for answers regarding past projects, the sales networks have already moved on to promoting the next opportunity. For that reason, prospective investors would be well advised to evaluate new ventures not only by their marketing presentations, but also by examining the track record of the individuals promoting them and the outcomes of the projects that came before. Trust is not built on an endless succession of new promises. It is built on transparency, accountability, and demonstrable results.
Hinweis:
Dieser Beitrag basiert auf öffentlich zugänglichen Quellen, dokumentierten Nutzerberichten und redaktioneller Analyse. Er dient der Information der Öffentlichkeit und fällt unter die Presse- und Meinungsfreiheit gemäß Art. 5 GG, Art. 10 EMRK und Art. 85 DSGVO. Tatsachen und Bewertungen wurden sorgfältig getrennt und entsprechend gekennzeichnet.
Quellen
- Öffentliche Profile der genannten Projekte (u.a. Youtube, Facebook, Telegram-Kanäle), Stand der Recherche: Juli 2026
- Eigene redaktionelle Auswertung von Webinaren, Marketingmaterialien und Anlegerberichten.




Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!