• Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
Note: We do not provide legal or tax advice; this is provided by professional lawyers.
BE CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
  • Lyoness – Lyconet – myWorld
  • Karatbars – GSPartners&Co
  • Other Companies
    • Safir – ZENIQ – XERA.PRO – XPRO
    • Avinoc – VOO
  • Services
    • Pyramid and Ponzi Schemes
    • Cryptocurrencies
    • Divorce Cases (private & business)
    • Inheritance Cases
    • Corporate matters (Takeovers)
    • Bad Debts
    • Asset Inquiry
    • Real Estate
  • Testimonials
  • International TV
  • About us
  • Contact
  • English
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Lyoness Europe AG loses appeal/Defence on grounds of international jurisdiction at court. Terms and Conditions declared null and void. Court makes no distinction between my World and/or Lyoness.

13. February 2020

The Lyoness pyramid scheme has a penchant for appealing to the jurisdiction of individual courts, invoking Swiss jurisdiction outside EU legislation.

As usual, the Lyoness pyramid scheme referred to international and local jurisdiction of the Austrian courts in a case concerning one Austrian Lyoness victim (more than €20,000 [über zweideutig!]) at Vienna Commercial Court (51 Cg 10/19f-13) against Lyoness Europe AG.

Vienna Commercial Court found the following, inter alia, in the rationale of its ruling on 3 February 2020 (51 Cg 10/19f-13):

The court has ruled dismissed the defence raised by Lyoness on grounds of lack of international jurisdiction.

The injured party petitioned on behalf of his company XXXXXXXXXX, of which he was the sole owner, for repayment of several investments made from the respondent resident in Switzerland (Lyoness). He referred to a convention on court jurisdiction in the question of Austrian court jurisdiction, which applied to this case. All members Lyoness were forced to sign to the new terms and conditions in order to be able to access their online member account; the members were unable to acknowledge the new terms and conditions beforehand.

The transition procedure involved Lyoness blocking the petitioner’s access to his online account and personal user area on the website of the respondent (Lyoness) until the petitioner accepted the new terms and conditions for Lyoness members as well as the additional general terms and conditions for Lyoness members on using extended membership benefits. The Lyoness website issued the following notification:

“[…] Terms and Conditions not confirmed

“You have not yet confirmed the Terms and Conditions “You are required to read and accept the Terms and Conditions in order to proceed to the internal area.”

The online user area of the petitioner was not (technically) accessible or unlocked until the petitioner ticked the box confirming acceptance of the terms and conditions.


International jurisdiction regarding the Lyoness headquarters in Switzerland is governed by the convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (LGVÜ 2007) concluded in Lugano on 30 October 2007. LGVÜ 2007 has been applicable to Switzerland since 1 January 2011.

In addition, Lyoness did not comply with the procedure specified in its intended transition to the new terms and conditions (change notice); in particular, Lyoness omitted any reference to the legal consequences of (not) objecting to the change, so the terms and conditions did not effectively come into force.

“The question as to whether my World Austria GmbH is in fact Lyoness Austria GmbH under a new name is moot, as is the matter of its headquarters in Graz,” the court added. The routine change in company name did not have the intended result for Lyoness.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/logo-konfliktmanagement.jpg 0 0 Dolphin Media Production /wp-content/uploads/2015/11/logo-konfliktmanagement.jpg Dolphin Media Production2020-02-13 17:11:342020-02-13 21:13:54Lyoness Europe AG loses appeal/Defence on grounds of international jurisdiction at court. Terms and Conditions declared null and void. Court makes no distinction between my World and/or Lyoness.
1 reply
  1. Ian Chittick
    Ian Chittick says:
    27. February 2020 at 7:34

    Amazing misconduct!!
    Keep up the great work EXPOSING this toxic group of companies now known as the myWorld International and Lyconet International MLM group

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Categories

  • Avinoc – VOO
  • Common
  • IM Mastery Academy
  • IM Mastery Academy (Iyovia)
  • Karatbars – GSPartners & Co
  • KASTECH Group International
  • Lyoness – Lyconet – MyWorld
  • MINING GRID
  • other companies
  • Premium Safe
  • Safir – ZENIQ – XERA.PRO – XPRO
  • SKAINET CermakFX
  • Solar9580 e.K.
  • SWM AG
  • WISE

Search

Search Search

Recent Posts

  • Gold Standard Bank, KC Bank Miami and KBC Coin – What remained of the grand Karatbars promises?
  • The MLM Recycle: Former Lyconet Giants Now Recruiting for TAGMarkets
  • NEXT STEP: From lobby group to European institution – BECM expands its structure to include a cooperative for legal interests (SCE)
  • The Next MLM Myth? TAG Markets as a Lifeline for eCredits Victims
  • Anyone who immediately calls every assignment procedure a “scam” simply hasn’t understood the system.

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • June 2018
  • January 2018
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016

BE CONFLICT
MANAGEMENT
LIMITED


 

Note: We do not provide legal or tax advice; this is provided by professional lawyers.

Facebook Twitter Instagram

OUR SERVICES

  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Divorce Cases (private & business)
  • Inheritance Cases
  • Corporate matters (Takeovers)
  • Bad Debts
  • Asset Inquiry
  • Real Estate

OUR CASES

  • Lyoness, Lyconet, myWorld
  • Karatbars/AcuaWellington/GSPartners & Minebase.com
  • SWM AG
  • Premium Safe
  • Avinoc – VOO
  • Safir – ZENIQ – XERA.PRO – XPRO

CONTACT

BE CONFLICT MANAGEMENT 77 Camden Street Lower, Dublin,
Dublin 2, D02 XE80, Ireland
Company registration number: 692857

[email protected]

Austria Phone +43 1 2051 0854 28
Austria Fax. +43 (1) 25330333458
Ireland Phone +353 1 270 9700
Australia Phone +61 2 6145 2753

© Copyright - BE Conflict Management LTD.
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Imprint
  • Disclaimer
Link to: Lyconet replaces itself as a contractual partner! Marketers lose! Link to: Lyconet replaces itself as a contractual partner! Marketers lose! Lyconet replaces itself as a contractual partner! Marketers lose! Link to: Poland’s Office of Competition and Consumer Protection, UOKiK, has classified Lyoness as a pyramid scheme by official decree of 30 December 2019. This means that funds will have to be reimbursed. Link to: Poland’s Office of Competition and Consumer Protection, UOKiK, has classified Lyoness as a pyramid scheme by official decree of 30 December 2019. This means that funds will have to be reimbursed. Poland’s Office of Competition and Consumer Protection, UOKiK, has classified...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top