• Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
Note: We do not provide legal or tax advice; this is provided by professional lawyers.
BE CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
  • Lyoness – Lyconet – myWorld
  • Karatbars – GSPartners&Co
  • Other Companies
    • Safir – ZENIQ – XERA.PRO – XPRO
    • Avinoc – VOO
  • Services
    • Pyramid and Ponzi Schemes
    • Cryptocurrencies
    • Divorce Cases (private & business)
    • Inheritance Cases
    • Corporate matters (Takeovers)
    • Bad Debts
    • Asset Inquiry
    • Real Estate
  • Testimonials
  • International TV
  • About us
  • Contact
  • English
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

The sunk cost effect: Why people stick with questionable investments

26. July 2025

From the outside, it often seems incomprehensible: Why do people stick with projects that obviously don’t benefit them or even harm them? The answer often lies not in a lack of intelligence or information, but in a psychological phenomenon: the sunk cost effect.

What is behind this effect?

The “sunk cost effect” describes the tendency to continue pursuing decisions that have already been made because time, money or energy has already been invested – even if it would make more sense objectively to pull out. These costs are no longer recoverable, i.e. they are ‘sunk’, but the emotional weight of the investment prevents many from drawing a line under it.

Particularly pronounced in the context of MLM and crypto projects

This error in thinking often occurs in areas where high hopes are linked to financial or idealistic promises. These include multi-level marketing (MLM) models and crypto investments that promise passive income or technological breakthroughs.

Former participants in projects such as Lyoness, Lyconet, myWorld, @Media, Safir, Zeniq, XPro, VOO, GSPartners, Apertum and DAO1 also report significant investments in licence packages, tokens or distribution structures. The promised returns failed to materialise for months or years. Nevertheless, many stuck with their investments, thinking: ‘I’ve already put so much into it, it can’t be for nothing now.’

A dangerous fallacy

It is precisely this thinking that often leads to further losses. From an economic point of view, only future opportunities and risks should play a role – not what has already been lost.

A call for self-reflection

Anyone who has invested in a project that is not working as promised, whether in cryptocurrencies, MLM or other structures, should ask themselves the following questions:

• Would I get involved again today, with the knowledge I have now?

• Or am I only sticking with it because I have already invested?

These considerations require courage. But they can help you make future decisions more freely and clearly.

Conclusion

The sunk cost effect is human, but also dangerous. Recognising it can free you from psychological traps and help you make more rational, self-determined decisions – in everyday life as well as in financial investments.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.bekm.us/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sunk-Cost-Fallacy-Grafik.jpg 1080 1920 Dolphin Media Production /wp-content/uploads/2015/11/logo-konfliktmanagement.jpg Dolphin Media Production2025-07-26 10:40:332025-07-26 10:40:41The sunk cost effect: Why people stick with questionable investments
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Categories

  • Avinoc – VOO
  • Common
  • IM Mastery Academy
  • IM Mastery Academy (Iyovia)
  • Karatbars – GSPartners & Co
  • KASTECH Group International
  • Lyoness – Lyconet – MyWorld
  • MINING GRID
  • other companies
  • Premium Safe
  • Safir – ZENIQ – XERA.PRO – XPRO
  • SKAINET CermakFX
  • Solar9580 e.K.
  • SWM AG
  • WISE

Search

Search Search

Recent Posts

  • Banks: Neutral in MLM structures, merciless towards victims – a system of turning a blind eye and arbitrariness
  • From dream salesman to business architect? – The past cannot be renamed.
  • Insolvency Update June 2026
  • Dada Pey’s Next Venture: From Universe Trading through Shiiro to Sonic AI & TAG Markets
  • Gold Standard Bank, KC Bank Miami and KBC Coin – What remained of the grand Karatbars promises?

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • June 2018
  • January 2018
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016

BE CONFLICT
MANAGEMENT
LIMITED


 

Note: We do not provide legal or tax advice; this is provided by professional lawyers.

Facebook Twitter Instagram

OUR SERVICES

  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Divorce Cases (private & business)
  • Inheritance Cases
  • Corporate matters (Takeovers)
  • Bad Debts
  • Asset Inquiry
  • Real Estate

OUR CASES

  • Lyoness, Lyconet, myWorld
  • Karatbars/AcuaWellington/GSPartners & Minebase.com
  • SWM AG
  • Premium Safe
  • Avinoc – VOO
  • Safir – ZENIQ – XERA.PRO – XPRO

CONTACT

BE CONFLICT MANAGEMENT 77 Camden Street Lower, Dublin,
Dublin 2, D02 XE80, Ireland
Company registration number: 692857

[email protected]

Austria Phone +43 1 2051 0854 28
Austria Fax. +43 (1) 25330333458
Ireland Phone +353 1 270 9700
Australia Phone +61 2 6145 2753

© Copyright - BE Conflict Management LTD.
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Imprint
  • Disclaimer
Link to: Vision One, VOO and Copper One: No FMA approval Link to: Vision One, VOO and Copper One: No FMA approval Vision One, VOO and Copper One: No FMA approval Link to: Apertum fails with urgent application – court rejects legal criticism of press report Link to: Apertum fails with urgent application – court rejects legal criticism of press report Apertum fails with urgent application – court rejects legal criticism of press...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top